1. The appellants Achhar Singh and Budhi Singh are aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 12.05.2010/27.05.2010 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh whereby their acquittal by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Mandi dated 24...

1. These Criminal Appeals, which have been heard through video conferencing, are directed against the common judgment dated 29.07.2008 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore whereby the findings of the trial Court...

1. Leave granted.

1. This appeal is filed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, in Second Appeal No. 537 of 1991, wherein the second appeal was allowed in favour of the respondent and the decree in favour of the appellant herein was set...

1. Application of impleadment is allowed.

1. The Union of India has moved these proceedings under Article 136 of the Constitution to challenge an order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka dated 5 May 2021.

1. The present proceeding arises out of a case instituted by the respondents, Sabu Trade Private Limited invoking jurisdiction of the Court of Judicial Magistrate No. IV, Salem (the Salem Court) under Section 156(3) of the Code...

2. Heard Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the...

1. Leave granted.

1. This judgment has been divided into the following sections to facilitate analysis: