1. Leave granted.

1. These two interlocutory applications filed by the respondent-wife are part of series of a long drawn acrimonious litigation between the husband and wife.

1. The Union of India and officials of the Border Security Force1 are in appeal against a judgment of a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dated 18 December 2018 which quashed disciplinary proceedings against the...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 08.08.2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 1432/2017 and Writ Petition No. 1406/2017, by which the High...

2. The background in which the controversy has arisen needs to be noticed.

2. As common question of law and facts arise in these group of appeals, all these appeals are decided and disposed of together by this common judgment and order.

2. At the outset, it is required to be noted that the present is a glaring example of fourm shopping by the accused which cannot be approved at all.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 05.09.2019 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in Criminal Appeal No. 875/2000, by which the High Court has dismissed the said...

1. Leave granted.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th August 2019, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Appeal No. 988/2012, wherein the aforesaid writ appeal was dismissed.