1. Leave granted.

1. The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur1, by the impugned judgment and order dated 22nd January, 20262, has spurned the appellant's challenge in a writ petition3 to an order of externment and, while dismissing such...

1. Interference caused by the High Court of Delhi1 in the writ petition preferred by the first respondent under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India resulting in setting aside the order passed by the learned...

1. Exemption Applications are allowed.

1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 28.07.2009 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court allowing the Writ Petition No. 1278 of 2003 filed by the respondent-Port of Bombay Trust, the Union of India and Others have...

1. Two of the above set of civil appeals relate to the very same property i.e. 65.94 acres in various survey numbers, of which the actual dispute is with respect to 40.65 acres; whether those are assigned lands, which revert back...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.  

1. Present appeal had been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 26th October 2018 passed by the High Court of Kerala in CRL. MC No. 8568/2017. By virtue of the impugned judgment and order, the petition filed by the...

1. Shorn of the multitude of facts, the present appeal arises from an order passed under Section 86 of the Representation of People Act, 19511, rejecting an Election Petition filed by the appellant herein. The respondent, who...