2. That the dispute is with respect to the land comprised in Khasra Nos. 717 (3-02), 718/1 (3-05), 756/2/1 (2-17) and 757/1 (3-07) measuring 12 bighas and 11 biswas in village Chattarpur, New Delhi.

2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, it appears that while declaring that the acquisition proceedings under the Act, 1894 is deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013, the High Court...

2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, it appears that it was the specific case on behalf of the appellants and so stated in the counter affidavit before the High Court that the possession of the land...

2. We have gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court. Before the High Court, it was the specific case on behalf of the appellants - original respondents that the possession of the subject land was...

1. Leave granted.

2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, it appears that while declaring that the acquisition proceedings under the Act, 1894 is deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013, the High Court...

1. Leave granted.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 03.08.2015 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in Writ Petition Nos. 1929 of 2015 and other allied writ petitions, preferred by...

2. Appellant herein applied for the post of Police Constable.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 28.01.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in CMA No. 38 of 2021 by which the High Court has dismissed the said Miscellaneous...