1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 30.04.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 92630 of 2020, by which the High Court has, in exercise of...
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
Harbhajan Singh v. State of Haryana and Others
1. The above writ petitions are preferred challenging the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 20141, creating a separate juristic entity for the management of historical Gurdwaras in the State of Haryana mentioned in Schedule...
State of Karnataka and Another v. M.A. Mohamad Sanaulla and Another
2. The dispute relates to land situated in village Chikkasanne within Bhuvanahalli State Forest area.
Har Naraini Devi and Another v. Union of India and Others
1. This civil appeal by the original writ petitioners before the High Court, assails the correctness of the judgment and order dated 11.09.2009 passed by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissing Writ Petition (Civil)...
Sumathy and Others v. Babu and Another
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 29.02.2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in MACA No. 1376 of 2006 and order dated 22.06.2016 passed in RP No. 461 of 2016 in MACA...
Selvakumar v. Manjula and Another
1. Leave granted.
Trimurthi Fragrances (P) Ltd., through its Director Shri Pradeep Kumar Agrawal v. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi, through its Principal Secretary (Finance) and Others
1. The main question raised in this batch of appeals is, whether, ‘Pan Masala’, which contains tobacco and gutka, covered by an Entry in the First Schedule to the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act...
SRC Aviation Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Another
1. Heard learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and gone through the record.
Maharishi Markandeshwar University and Another v. Akriti Sharma and Others
1. Leave granted.
Excise and Taxation Commissioner Haryana v. Excel Crop Care Ltd.
1. These are cases where by the impugned orders the High Court has not deemed it fit to condone the delay of 469 days in the three appeals filed by the petitioners against the order of the State VAT Tribunal.







