1. This order is necessitated due to a difference of opinion and approach amongst various judgments, on the question of whether, after recording conviction for a capital offence, under law, the court is obligated to conduct a...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. This appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, hereinafter referred to as the “IBC” is against a judgment and order dated 23rd July 2019 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)...

1. Heard learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and gone through the record.

1. These are cases where by the impugned orders the High Court has not deemed it fit to condone the delay of 469 days in the three appeals filed by the petitioners against the order of the State VAT Tribunal.

1. We find no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. The civil appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.  

1. The present appeals arises from a judgment rendered by the Bombay High Court, Goa Bench1. The dispute arises out of inventory proceedings2 under Chapter XVII by Articles 1369 to 1447 of the Portuguese Civil Procedure Code...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgments and orders dated 16.12.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Trade Tax Revision Nos. 664/1999 and 667/1999, by which, the High Court has...

1. Leave granted.