1. The Reserve Bank of India has sought a transfer of the writ petitions pending before various High Courts challenging the validity of the Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act 2020 (Act No 39 of 2020) and its circular bearing No...
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
Roopwati and Others v. Ram Kishan and Others
1. This appeal is of the claimants, which arises out of the Impugned Judgment dated 26.09.2018 by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in an appeal against the order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short...
Kapil Kumar v. Raj Kumar
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 05.08.2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Regular Second Appeal No. 1727 of 2016, by which, the High Court has...
Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. Ltd. and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
1. This appeal has a chequered history.
Sunita Burman v. Commissioner, M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board and Others
1. The appellant - widow of Late Munna Lal Burman, is aggrieved by the judgment dated 23rd January, 2020, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur in Writ Appeal No. 1600 of...
Raychem RPG Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Palghar
1. Delay condoned.
Aishat Shifa v. State of Karnataka and Others
1. The challenge in the present appeals is to an order passed by the Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court on 15.3.2022, dismissing the challenge to the Government Order dated 5.2.2022. Such Government Order directed the...
Thermax Ltd. through its Director v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-1
1. Heard Mr. V. Sridharan, the learned Senior Counsel representing the appellant. Also heard Mr. V. Chandra Shekara Bharathi, learned counsel representing the Revenue.
Md. Anowar Hussain v. State of Assam
2. Before dealing with the matter in necessary details, we may draw a brief outline to indicate the contours of the forthcoming discussion.
Deputy Commissioner of Gift Tax, Central Circle-II v. BPL Limited
1. The issue raised in these appeals relates to the valuation of 29,46,500 shares of M/s. BPL Sanyo Technologies Limited and 69,49,900 shares of M/s. BPL Sanyo Utilities and Appliances Limited, which were gifted by the respondent...







