2. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under:-

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties at length and perused the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court.

1. By way of this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for appropriate directions/orders directing the respondents - States to enable free public access to chargesheets and final...

2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties and on going through the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court, it appears that a specific plea was raised before the High Court on...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi dated 13.02.2017 in Writ Petition (C) No. 8685 of 2015 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ...

2. In the present case, the notification under Section 4 of the Act, 1894 was issued on 27.06.1996. The Award was also passed vide Award dated 22.06.1999.

2. The facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under:—

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 7004 of 2015 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petition preferred...

1. Leave granted.

1. Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and from the material on record, it appears that now it is the case on behalf of the Revenue that the respondent being the owner shall be entitled to depreciation.