1. An application has been filed by the State of Haryana in the proceedings in Malik Mazhar Sultan v. U P Public Service Commission1 seeking two directions:

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad (in short, “the High Court”), dated 24.02.2016, passed in First Appeal No. 112 of 2016, by which the appeal of the appellant...

1. Leave granted.

. This is an appeal preferred by the accused challenging the impugned judgment of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore by which the order of their acquittal, passed by the Sessions Court, was overturned.

1. Leave granted.

1. The present civil appeal challenges an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi1 (hereafter, “Commission”). The application by - CPL Ashish Kumar Chauhan (hereafter, “appellant”) for compensation...

1. Leave granted.

1. We have perused the Status Report submitted by the State of Uttar Pradesh.

1. This appeal has been filed assailing the judgment dated 06.07.2012, passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, in Writ Appeal No. 2458 of 2010 whereby the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 20.05.2010 passed...

1. Notwithstanding the series of orders passed by this Court regulating the manufacture, sale and bursting firecrackers, one more consideration is ignited by Respondent No. 7 - TANFAMA, which is stated to be an association...