1. This case before us deals with the asymmetric federal model of governance in India, involving the contest of power between a Union Territory and the Union Government. The issue is who would have control over the “services” in...

1. Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue has stated at the Bar that the tax amount involved in the present Appeal is lower than the monetary limit fixed to prefer an Appeal before this Court. Therefore, he has requested to...

1. Leave granted.

1. Delay condoned.

1. Leave granted.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, respondent no. 1 and respondent no. 2.

1. A letter has been circulated by the petitioner praying that one of us may recuse from the matter as while deciding one matter before the High Court in the year 2011 arising out of the same FIR, the Court made stricture against...

1. In exercise of powers under sub-clause (2) of Clause 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution of India, on 31st December 1977, the Hon'ble President of India declared the entire District of Sundargarh in the State of Orissa...

1. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (in short, ‘BPCL’) - the beneficiary of the acquisition is in appeal before us against the Judgment dated 22-12-2009 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras as...

1. The present Appeal is confined to only one question, namely, “whether when income is taxed on gross basis, non inclusion of charges towards reimbursement of expenses would be in violation of law as it would tantamount to...