1. The present appeals arise from the common judgment dated 08th July, 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh deciding the Murder Reference1 prepared by the Judge, Special Court...

1. Leave granted.  

1. Notwithstanding the series of orders passed by this Court regulating the manufacture, sale and bursting firecrackers, one more consideration is ignited by Respondent No. 7 - TANFAMA, which is stated to be an association...

1. Leave granted.

1. This batch of appeals arises from a judgment dated 21 July 2010 by a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in a set of petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution.

1. Leave granted.

1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned appeals are same, the parties are also the same and the challenge is also to the self-same judgment and order passed by the High Court those were taken up for hearing analogously...

1. Ajit Pal @ Bobby, a 15-year-old lad, was killed brutally in the last week of July, 2013. A neighbour, Om Prakash Yadav, along with his brother, Raja Yadav, and son, Rajesh @ Rakesh Yadav, stood trial in Sessions Case No. 560...

1. These three appeals are against the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi (in short “the High Court”) dated 28.07.2009 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 962 of 2004; 977 of 2004; 981 of 2004; 14 of 2005; and 61 of 2005...

1. The petitioner, currently serving a life imprisonment sentence for a crime committed in 1996, punishable under Sections 302 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code (hereafter “IPC”) approaches this court seeking to enforce his right...