1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. Heard the appellant-in-person and the learned counsel appearing for the Union of India.

1. On 14 November 2017, a Bench of two Judges of this Court referred a batch of four petitions, which invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution, to the Constitution Bench in Sivanandan C T v...

1. The order dated October 30, 2009 passed by the Orissa High Court in Writ Appeal No. 108/2009 is under challenge in the present appeal. Vide aforesaid order, the order passed by the Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 9069 of 2008...

1. The appellant stood charged and convicted under Section 8(b) read with Section 15(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as “the NDPS Act”).

1. On 7 October 2016, there was a difference of opinion in the two Judge Bench which was hearing Writ Petition (Civil) No 294 of 2015 differed. The petition was placed before a three-Judge Bench on 10 August 2017, when the...

1. Leave granted.

1. Application for intervention is allowed.

1. This batch of writ petitions seeks a writ, order or directions in the nature of certiorari for quashing of order dated 17th November 2021 passed by the respondent No. 1 for further extension of tenure of the respondent No. 2...

1. The short question involved is whether the toughened glass manufactured and sold by the appellant are to be classified as “glass and glassware” or as an unclassified item subjected to lower tax.