1. This appeal assails the correctness of the judgment and order dated 10.11.2010, passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, whereby the Second Appeal preferred by the defendant-respondent was allowed, and the suit for...

1. The appellant is the husband of the deceased, who was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 306 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’). The marriage between the appellant and the deceased was ten...

1. This appeal assails the correctness of the judgment and order dated 23.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Delhi in RFA No. 191 of 2013 between Shakeel Ahmed and Syed Akhlaq Hussain, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the...

1. Delay condoned.

1. The appellant Anil Kumar has been convicted under Sections 302 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code1 by both the courts below and has been sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs. 50,000/-, and in default to undergo...

1. Leave granted.

1. This batch of five Review Petitions seeks to review the common Judgment and Order dated 06.09.2022 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No. 1661 of 2020 and Civil Appeal No. 2568 of 2020. Both the said appeals were preferred...

1. Leave granted.

1. We are not inclined to proceed further with the present writ petition, as it is clear from the counter affidavit filed by respondent no. 2 - Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) that the cellular mobile telephone...

1. The order of this Court of 26 September 2023 sets out the background. Rather than replicate the background, we set it out below :