1. Leave granted.

1. This appeal by special leave is at the instance of the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS), Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (AYUSH), Government of India...

1. The aggrieved appellant has preferred the present appeal challenging the legality and validity of the impugned judgment and order dated 25.04.2022 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur in Writ Appeal No. 72 of...

1. Leave granted.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the appeals papers

1. This is a case that involves classification of goods under the Central Excise Act, 1944. Against the decision of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, the appellant approached the High Court in exercise of...

1. This is a case that involves classification of goods under the Central Excise Act, 1944. Against the decision of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, the appellant approached the High Court in exercise of...

1. These two appeals arise out of service tax demands on the basis of four Show Cause Notices.

1. On 13 December 2019, a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Calcutta while exercising jurisdiction in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, WP No 268 of 2018, issued the following directions:

1. Aggrieved by the impugned judgment1 of the Allahabad High Court, the appellant has approached this court with a simple question of law, as to whether the High Court erred in modifying the arbitral award to the extent of...