1. These criminal appeals, by special leave, assail the common judgment and order dated 12th October, 2022 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Jabalpur (“High Court”, hereafter) whereby Criminal Appeal No. 10474 of 2019...

1. This appeal is at the instance of the Accused-Appellant namely, Sathyan against the order and judgement dated 5th September, 2019 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Appeal No. 2822 of 20081, wherein...

1. Aggrieved by the impugned judgment1 of the Allahabad High Court, the appellant has approached this court with a simple question of law, as to whether the High Court erred in modifying the arbitral award to the extent of...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. In these two appeals, we are dealing only with accused no. 5-Balla @ Farhat, accused No. 6-Habib and accused No. 7-Imran.

1. We have gone through the order of the Settlement Commissioner dated 09.05.2007, who has recorded that the necessary duty was paid but in exercise of his power he decided to waive the interest component.

1. We have gone through the order of the Settlement Commissioner dated 09.05.2007, who has recorded that the necessary duty was paid but in exercise of his power he decided to waive the interest component.

1. In the present appeal, order dated 02.09.2010, passed by the High Court of Kerala in CRP No. 285 of 2008 has been challenged.

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.