1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts:—  

1. Leave granted.

1. The appeal filed by the appellant presently before us challenges the Judgement and order dated 03.10.2019, passed in a second appeal by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The impugned Judgement of the High Court has reversed...

1. The present petition has been filed impugning order1 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court2. Along with the petition, an application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 1,633 days in filing the present...

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment1 passed by the High Court2 in S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 170 of 2009, whereby the judgment and decree of the Trial Court3 was upheld.

1. The case in hand is an example of a party suffering on account of total casualness in dealing with the matter. An avoidable litigation.

1. The appellants are accused nos. 3, 1, 6 and 7 respectively.

1. A routine service dispute involving competing claims for appointment was transformed into a pleasurable discourse by the newly designated senior advocates of this court, Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Mr...

1. Leave granted.

1. Heard Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for appellant Nos. 1 and 3. Mr. R.K. Kapoor, learned counsel appears for appellant No. 2. The State is represented by Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, learned Additional Advocate...