1. In the present case, the Respondent, who was appointed as a Constable in the Police Department, State Government of UP, [hereinafter “Department”] on 26th February, 1975 and subsequently promoted to the post of Head Constable...

1. Heard Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for appellant Nos. 1 and 3. Mr. R.K. Kapoor, learned counsel appears for appellant No. 2. The State is represented by Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, learned Additional Advocate...

1. Leave granted in the above matters.

1. Leave granted only in SLP (C) No. 5817 of 2023.

1. The issue for consideration before us is whether the timeline for refund under Section 38(3) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 20041 must be mandatorily followed while recovering dues under the Act by adjusting them against...

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

1. Applications for listing the review petition in open Court are dismissed.

1. The appellants are accused who have been convicted by the Trial Court for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 323, read with Sections 149, 147, and 148 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellants have been sentenced...

1. This is plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for possession and confirmation of his possession over the suit land which was decreed in his favour by the court of first instance but the decree was set aside in First Appeal...

1. Leave granted.