1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 06.08.2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 4442 of 1999 by which the High Court, in exercise of Articles 226...

1. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, to whom the Indian Bank assigned the loans and the underlying security of a particular borrower, has come up with the above appeals challenging the judgment of the Division Bench...

1. Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos. 6448/2022, 5381/2022, 5079/2022, 6092/2022, 6534/2022, 6158/2022, 6316/2022, 6281/2022, 6545/2022, 6038/2022.

1. Two important questions of law, with regard to the legislative competence of the Kerala State Legislature to enact the Kerala Revocation of Arbitration Clauses and Reopening of Awards Act, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as the...

1. Application for Oral Hearing in the Review Petition is rejected.

1. Application for listing of Review Petition in open Court is rejected.

1. This application has been preferred by Ms. Indira Jaising, learned Senior Advocate of this Court praying inter alia:

1. These Special Leave Petitions arise out of the final judgment and order dated 05.03.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition (Lodging) No. 56 of 2018 and Notice of Motion (Lodging) No. 21 of 2018...

1. This appeal questions an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1, (hereinafter, “NCDRC”) which allowed the insurance claim of Levi Strauss (India) Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter, “Levi/insured/respondent”). Prior...

1. This appeal raises an issue as to whether increments granted to the appellant, while he was in service, can be recovered from him almost 10 years after his retirement on the ground that the said increments were granted on...