1. In the present batch of appeals, this Court has to decide the contours defining the independence and impartiality of arbitral tribunals under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.1

1. This judgment arises from a Writ Petition instituted in 2005 seeking directions to ensure meaningful access to public spaces for persons with disabilities1.

1. The petitioner which is a company duly incorporated under the laws of the United States of America1 has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under sub-sections (6) and (12) of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

1. The petitioner has instituted proceedings under Article 137 of the Constitution read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 seeking a review of the judgment of a three-Judge Bench of this Court dated 25 August...

1. For convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. Since the captioned petitions raise analogous issues between the same parties, those were taken up together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:

1. The appellant is the complainant on whose complaint a First Information Report being Crime No. 21 of 2021 (for short, ‘the impugned FIR’) was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 347, 504, 506, 116 and...

1. The renowned American poet H. W. Longfellow penned to the effect that a torn jacket might soon be mended, but a bruised heart of a child would be beyond reviviscence. Certainly, it contains the gospel truth as relates a child...