1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
Goqii Technologies Private Limited v. Sokrati Technologies Private Limited
1. Leave granted.
Tej Prakash Pathak and Others v. Rajasthan High Court and Others
1. A three-Judge Bench of this Court while accepting the salutary principle that once the recruitment process commences the State or its instrumentality cannot tinker with the “rules of the game” insofar as the prescription of...
Commissioner of Customs v. Canon India Pvt. Ltd.
1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—
State Bank of India and Others v. Consortium of Mr. Murari Lal Jalan and Mr. Florian Fritsch and Another
1. For convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—
Ramji Lal Bairwa and Another v. State of Rajasthan and Others
1. The renowned American poet H. W. Longfellow penned to the effect that a torn jacket might soon be mended, but a bruised heart of a child would be beyond reviviscence. Certainly, it contains the gospel truth as relates a child...
Devendra Kumar and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh
1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 4th October, 2010 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No. 15 of 2004 whereby the High Court dismissed the Criminal...
Manik Panjabrao Kalmegh v. Executive Engineer Bembla Project Division Yavatmal and Others
1. Leave granted.
Union of India and Others v. Wing Commander M.S. Mander
1. The respondent, along with four other officers of the Air Force, were tried by a General Court Martial (for short ‘GCM’) for various offences.
Directorate of Enforcement v. Bibhu Prasad Acharya, etc.
1. The appellant has filed complaints against the respondents and others under Section 44(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short, ‘the PMLA’).







