1. Heard Mr. V. Chitambaresh, learned senior counsel for the appellants; Ms. Prerna Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 1-State of Andhra Pradesh, and; Mr. Sateesh Galla, learned counsel for respondent no. 2-Visakhapatnam...

1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 01.04.2025 passed by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court1 thereby dismissing the writ petition preferred by the petitioner with a cost of Rs. 5,00,000/- with a further...

1. In the present appeal, the prosecution case has its genesis in an incident alleged to have occurred on 12.05.1999 at about 9:30 p.m. in village Sarsi, within the jurisdiction of Police Station Industrial Area, Jaora, District...

1. Leave granted. For ease of reference, this judgment is divided into the following heads:

1. Leave granted.

1. This is a batch of statutory Appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, hereinafter referred to as, “The Electricity Act”) assailing the common judgment and order dated 12.02.2024 passed by the...

1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 01.04.2025 passed by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court1 thereby dismissing the writ petition preferred by the petitioner with a cost of Rs. 5,00,000/- with a further...

1. This appeal assails the order dated 02.08.2022 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), whereby order dated 20.02.2020 passed by National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), was set aside.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.