Having heard Sri Colin Gonsalves, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the first respondent, we find that the controversy surviving in the above case is very narrow.

1. Revenue is the Appellant. Civil Appeal Nos. 5939-5941 of 2010 arise from the Order dated 09.11.2009 in Central Excise Appeal Nos. E/591, 592 & 596 of 2009 in the CESTAT, South Zonal Bench at Bangalore, and in turn the said...

Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. Reversal of an original decree in a first appeal resulting in dismissal of a suit for declaration and mandatory injunction, since affirmed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in a second appeal, is under...

1. Our endeavour is to institutionalise the process of solid waste management for our country. An integral part of which relates to making of enforceable laws governing the subject, and this is already achieved with the issuance...

1. These two appeals, though arising out of the separate proceedings before the two different High Courts, involve substantially overlapping questions of law, namely the right of an employee to withdraw a tendered resignation...

1. Leave granted.

1. The present Civil Appeal, arising out of leave granted by this Court, has been preferred by Rupesh R. Gaonkar and other similarly situated persons (hereinafter referred to as “the appellants”), being aggrieved by the judgment...