1. The Appeal arises from the Order dated 06.01.2012 in MASC No. 4237 of 2008 in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad at Lucknow Bench.

1. In this appeal, by special leave, the appellant [a former Indian Trade Service (ITS) officer] has mounted a challenge to the judgment and order dated 18th January, 20241 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi2...

The appeals call in question the impugned orders, passed at the instance of the Central Board of Trustees (under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 19521), which imported the finding of this Court...

1. Leave granted.

1. In this appeal, challenge has been made to the judgment and order dated 09.04.2012 passed by the then High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad (briefly the ‘High Court’ hereinafter) in Civil Revision Petition No...

1. Non-admissibility of a document on which the plaintiff relies for seeking relief in his suit is sought to be made a ground for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19081...

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

Heard Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General for the appellant and Mr. Riwaj Rai, learned counsel for the respondent No. 8 in SLP(C) No. 498/2024.

1. Seventeen persons were accused of ambushing three persons of a family and killing one of them, whose brothers were the other two members.

1. Leave granted.