1. The delay in filing the Special Leave Petitions, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, is condoned.

1. Concurrent findings of the Trial Court and the Appellate Court were reversed by the High Court in a second appeal.

The above contempt petition was filed by the maternal grandparents of the minor child, alleging non-compliance of the judgment passed at Annexure P2. Unfortunately, the mother of the child, the daughter of the petitioner is no...

1. Delay condoned.

In the above batch, the challenge by the Union of India and the Department is against the impugned judgment having held the omission of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 to be applicable to...

1. Leave granted.

1. The present Appeals lay challenge against the final order dated 28.11.2007 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai1, whereby the CESTAT, by common order, allowed the appeals...

1. The present Appeal assails the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi, at New Delhi, in W.P.(C) No. 307/2011, whereby the High Court dismissed the said writ petition filed by the appellant and upheld the orders...

1. Delay Condoned.

Having heard Sri Colin Gonsalves, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the first respondent, we find that the controversy surviving in the above case is very narrow.