1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand in Review Application No. 105/2008 on 23.04.2008 wherein the factum of death of Pradeep Kumar, the successor-in-interest of Tika Ram ...

1. This appeal arises under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code1, against a judgment the dated 4 January 2021 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal2.

1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the “NCLAT”) dated 21st December 2018, thereby allowing the appeal filed by respondent herein.

1. These appeals raise interesting questions relatable to Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [the “Arbitration Act, 1996”] which provisions deal inter alia with recognition and enforcement of foreign awards...

1. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 06.04.2016 passed by the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur in Writ Petition No. 2153 of 2016.

1. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.

1. Upon being found guilty of committing contempt of Court, the petitioners who are husband and wife respectively, were sentenced to simple imprisonment for three months along with a fine of Rs. 2000/- each, by a learned Judge of...

1. Leave granted.

1. We are facing the problem raised in these petitions on account of the recalcitrant attitude of the Government in not appointing High Court Judges for years together even where the recommendations have been cleared by the...

1. Leave granted.