1. This appeal, by special leave, arises out of the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (‘National Commission’) delivered on 18.12.2008 dismissing the Revision Petition filed against the judgment of...

1. Leave granted.

1. The Appellants were initially appointed as Constables in the State of Uttar Pradesh. Pursuant to an advertisement issued for filling up the posts of Constable Drivers, the Appellants participated in the selection test.

1. An advertisement was issued calling for applications for appointment to 384 posts of Police Sub-Inspectors, Attendants (Sergeant) and Company Commanders by the Home Department of the Government of Jharkhand on 01.03.2008. 1217...

1. The enquiry report of Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Patnaik, Retired Judge of this Court has been placed before us. On perusal of the report, we find that it is quite comprehensive which has dealt with the scope of the enquiry, the...

1. While issuing notice on 11.08.2017 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 20417 of 2017, this Court directed that status quo as on the day with regard to the shareholding of Fortis Healthcare Holding Private Limited (‘FHHPL’...

1. This special leave petition was heard finally; Leave granted, it impugns an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1 (hereafter “Commission”) which affirmed the order of the Goa State Consumer Disputes...

1. These petitions arise out of judgments of the High Court of Delhi (hereinafter ‘High Court’) dated 14.02.2019 and 25.07.2019.

1. This appeal arises out of order and judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka (hereinafter, ‘High Court’) dated 26.03.2009, dismissing Writ Appeal No. 7758 of 2003 [ULC] filed by the Appellant herein...

1. These special leave petitions arise out of common order and judgement of the High Court of Madras (hereinafter, ‘High Court’) dated 8.01.2020. By the impugned judgement, the High Court allowed Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Nos...