Service Law — Regularisation of service — Respondents took part in operational works Food Corporation of India’s depots as ‘Analyser’, ‘Picker’ and ‘Dusting Operators’ from 1-1-1983 — There was a dispute with regard to mode of...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Narayana Reddy @ Babu v. State of Karnataka
Six persons were implicated in a trial for murder of one Govind Reddy.
Samaj Parivartana Samudaya & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Allow the instant application and direct NMDC to restrain from adopting differential pricing mechanism for the iron ore sold in the e-auction in the State of Karnataka.
Raminder Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.
Service Law — Punjab Public Works Department (Irrigation Branch), Research Assistants’ State Service Class III Rules, 1956 — Rr. 10(1)(b)(i) and (2) — Promotion order cancelled and reverted from post of Research Assistant Grade B...
Govt. of NCT of Delhi thr. Secretary, Land and Building Department and Anr. v. Vikas Malhotra and Ors.
Leave granted.
Commnr. of Central Excise, Meerut v. M/s. Dewan Rubber Industries Ltd. & Ors.
Excise — Central Excise — Penalty — Appeal to Supreme Court — Customs Act, 1962 — S. 114-A — Appeal against the order of the Tribunal reducing the penalty holding that the condition of notification was contravened only on or...
Principal Secretary, Government of Karnataka and Another v. Ragini Narayan and Another
Trusts and Trustees — Civil Suit — Appeal — Registration Act, 1908 — S. 47 — Appeal against the judgment of the high court confirming a decree passed in a suit seeking declaration that the plaintiff is donor trustee — It is...
Abhijit Pawar v. Hemant Madhukar Nimbalkar & Anr.
Leave granted.
Petromarine Products Ltd. v. Ocean Marine Services Company Ltd. and others
Madras High Court Original Side Rules — Or. XLII Rr. 3 and 11 — Admiralty jurisdiction — Disbursements of the sale proceeds received by sale of the ship in question named as motor vessel ‘Eleni’ — Order for — Validity — Suit...
Mukarrab etc. v. State of U.P.
Totally six accused including the appellants herein were convicted.

