Leave granted.
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat v. M/s. Haryana Sheet Glass Ltd. & Ors.
The Respondent No. 1-assessee is a 100% EoU which is manufacturing glass sheets. In the process of this manufacturing, it is using furnace oil, light diesel oil and high speed diesel and claimed benefit of Notification No. 1/95...
Vinod Verma v. Union of India and Others
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw these Special Leave Petitions with liberty to file an application for review before the High Court on the ground that the statement made that the case is covered by...
Commissioner of Central Excise-I, Pune v. M/s. General Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd.
It is not in dispute that the respondent-assessee is a Small Scale Industrial Unit (SSI Unit). It claimed the benefit of Exemption Notification No. 1/93 dated 28.02.1993 and the successor notification as per which the SSI Units...
C. Chakkaravarthy and Ors. v. Tmt. M. Satyavathy, IAS and Ors.
Service Law — Promotion — Post of Assistant Engineers — Petitioners allege deliberate violation by the respondents of the judgment and order dt. 22-4-2010 passed by Apex Court in N. Suresh Nathan, (2010) 5 SCC 692 : (2010) 2 SCC...
Veerendra Kumar Dubey v. Chief of Army Staff & Ors.
A. Armed Forces — Army Act, 1950 and Rules, 1954 — Discharge — Enquiry — If mandatory — Though, Rule does not provide for anything beyond an opportunity to the individual concerned to show cause against his contemplated discharge...
Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa v. Bhagyanagar Metals Limited
Excise — Excise duty — Cellular telephones were imported by the assesses — Valuation of — Assessees had sought to clear the goods by classifying them under Custom Tariff Heading 8525.20.17 — Along with the cellular phones, the...
M/s. Cast Metal Industries(P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise-IV, Kolkata
Excise — Excise duty — Classification of goods — Goods in question are meant for specific purpose viz. in the motor vehicles that too for specific model of the motor vehicles as its parts — Question whether the goods are...
Chief Engineer (Naval Works) & Anr. v. A.P. Asha
Service Law — Compassionate appointment — Claim for, by respondent — Under the policy, respondent could not be appointed as there were claimants who were more needy than the respondent — Policy of the appellants had been strictly...
K. Mallesh v. K. Mallesh
Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the impugned order, we find that the said order passed at an interlocutory stage, during the pendency of the suit. The question is with regard to the...