Category - Latest Judgments

A. Service Law — Pension — Option — PEPSU Road Transport Corporation Employees/Pension Gratuity and General Provident Fund Regulations 1992 — Regn. 4 — Scope of — Held that a plain reading of the Regulations does not indicate...

A. Penal Code, 1860 — Ss. 120-B, 302, 364, 201 and 34 — Circumstantial evidence — Motive and last seen evidence — Absence of documentary evidence — When not material — As per prosecution, appellants killed the deceased on account...

A. Election — Election Statutes, Rules, Regulations, Norms, Etc. — Representation of the People Act, 1951 — S. 123(3) — Corrupt practice — Interpretation of — Effect of amendment introduced in 1961 to sub-section (3) deleting the...

A. Labour Law — Regularisation of Army Porters — Scope of — Held that consistent with the position in law and the background of the case in regard to regularisation, a mandamus to the Union government to regularise cannot be...

The respondent was employed with the appellant-bank and was during the relevant period posted as Officer in-charge at the appellant-bank's Sultanpur branch in District Sultanpur in the State of Uttar Pradesh. He was, by an order...

As far as the re-promulgation of an Ordinance is concerned, I am of opinion that the re-promulgation of an Ordinance by the Governor of a State is not per se a fraud on the Constitution.

Advocates — Advocates Act, 1961 — Ss. 16 and 23(5) — Designation as senior advocates — Application for recall the order reserving the matter for orders — Writ petition filed before the high court challenging the constitutional...

This proceeding is a sequel to the order and directions issued on 21 October 2016. In the previous order of this Court, the status report submitted by the three member Committee (consisting of Justice R M Lodha, Justice Ashok...

These appeals are filed against the common final judgment and order dated 12.08.2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal Nos. 448-DB and 395-DB of 1998 whereby the Division Bench of the...

The appellant (Harjas Rai Makhija represented by his legal representatives) is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 3rd April, 2012 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in FA No. 961 of 2010 whereby his...