(Kurian Joseph and R. Banumathi, JJ.)
Sushil Kumar Jindal __________________________________ Appellant
v.
Aasia Begum ______________________________________ Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 719 of 2008, decided on February 21, 2017
The Judgement of the Court was delivered by
Kurian, J.:—
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court, by which the High Court has upheld the views taken by the Rent Controller on the bonafide requirement. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
3. However, looking to the facts of the case, we grant time to the appellant upto 31st December, 2017 to surrender vacant and peaceful possession of the premises in question to the respondent, subject to filing the usual undertaking in this Court within a period of four weeks from today.
4. Towards use and occupation charges, the appellant shall continue to pay rent @ Rs. 2450/- (Rupees Two Thousand Four Hundred and Fifty) per month to the respondent.
5. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Civil Appeal No(s). 719/2008
Sushil Kumar Jindal ________________________________ Appellant
v.
Aasia Begum _____________________________________ Respondent
Date : 21/02/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
(Before Kurian Joseph and R. Banumathi, JJ.)
For Appellant(s) Mr. Gagan Gupta, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed, Adv.
Mr. Milan Laskar, Adv.
Mr. Parvez Dabas, Adv.
Ms. Uzmi Jamel Hussain, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
Order
6. The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment.
7. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.
———
