Category - Latest Judgments

Limitation — Limitation Act, 1963 — Arts. 18, 55 and 113 — Difference between Art. 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides for filing of a suit for recovery of money for work done by the plaintiff, within three years from the...

Income Tax — Income Tax Act, 1961 — S. 263 — Appeal — Appeal against the order of the high court setting aside the order of the commissioner of income tax in exercise of his revisional jurisdiction issuing show cause notice and...

Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the relevant material.  

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order dated 14th December, 2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras.

Though these interlocutory applications filed by the State of Tamil Nadu have not been listed, they are taken on Board.

We have heard Mr. R. Basant, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant viz., Chandran and Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State and perused the record.

This Court vide order dated 28th February, 2017, taking note of the submissions of Mr. Sriram Parakkat, learned counsel appearing for the applicant in I.A. No. 247 of 2017, had directed as follows:—

Advocates — Advocates Act, 1961 — S. 36 — Disciplinary Committee of Bar Council of Tamil Nadu — Enquiry conducted by — Sustainability — In the instant case, Disciplinary Committee consisting of members not familiar with the...

Doctrines and Maxims — Actus curiae neminem gravabit — No one should suffer any prejudice because of the act of the Court — Invoking of — Legal maxim held, cannot operate in a vacuum — It has to get the sustenance from the facts...

Sales Tax and VAT — Bihar Finance Act, 1981 — S. 19 — Word “information” used in S. 19 — Scope — Held, word “information” used is of the widest amplitude and should not be construed narrowly — It comprehends not only variety of...