After hearing the elaborate submissions of the learned counsel appearing on either side, we are of the opinion that the matters are required to be heard by a Constitution Bench
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Sec. and Others v. K. Balu and Another
Mr. Rajiv Dutta, senior advocate, represents the State of Arunachal Pradesh.
Ram Murti Devi v. Pushpa Devi and Others
Rent Control and Eviction — Eviction — Sub-letting — Proof — Plea of sub-letting/sub-tenancy, has to be established on parameters of law — Defendant’s plea that “M” was a servant and sub-tenant — Witnesses specifically stated...
The Manager, Corporate Educational Agency v. James Mathew & Ors.
The appellants-minority educational institutions chose to appoint a teacher of their choice belonging to their respective community to the post of Headmaster, ignoring the available senior teachers from the same community.
Kamaljit Kaur v. The State of Punjab & Ors.
The learned counsel appearing on both sides submit that the matter pertains to appointment of an Anganwadi worker and essentially it is a dispute between the daughter and the daughter-in-law.
B.A. Naik Since Deceased by his LRs v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, UKP, Bilagi, Karnataka etc.
Leave granted.
Arrive Safe Society of Chandigarh v. The Union Territory of Chandigarh & Anr.
On 15 December 2016, this Court rendered judgment in the State of Tamil Nadu v. K Balu1. Several directions were issued to obviate dangers to the lives and safety of persons using the highways, resulting from the menace of...
Sampurna Behrua v. Union of India & Ors.
The Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development is present in the Court today.
Kale (Dead) Rep. Thr. LRs. v. Union of India
This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 27.04.2004 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Civil Revision Petition No. 794 of 1990 whereby the High Court dismissed the revision petition filed by...
Kala Ram v. State of Punjab & Anr.
Despite service is complete on the respondents, no one appears for them. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and considered the matter.

