Latest Judgments

Kala Ram v. State of Punjab & Anr.

Despite service is complete on the respondents, no one appears for them. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and considered the matter.

 

(Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha, JJ.)

Kala Ram _________________________________________ Appellant

v.

State of Punjab & Anr. ____________________________ Respondent(s)

Criminal Appeal No(s). 1109 of 2017 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 4313 of 2017], decided on July 11, 2017

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

1. Despite service is complete on the respondents, no one appears for them. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and considered the matter.

2. Leave granted.

3. After going into all the materials placed and the grievance expressed, we are inclined to consider the claim of the appellant. Therefore, we direct that in the event of arrest of the appellant in connection with FIR No. 221 dated 1st November, 2016 registered at P.S. Patran, District Patiala, Punjab, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority. The accused appellant shall cooperate with the investigation at all further stages as may be required and in the event there is any failure on the part of the appellant to so cooperate, it will be open for the prosecution to seek cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by the present order. We also make it clear that it will be open to the Arresting Authority to impose such condition(s) as may be considered fit and appropriate.

4. The Arresting Authority is free to impose appropriate conditions as he deems fit.

5. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

Kala Ram _________________________________________ Petitioner

v.

The State of Punjab & Anr _________________________ Respondent(s)

(FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 42826/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 42827/2017

Date: 11-07-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

(Before Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha, JJ.)

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aditya Singh, AOR

Mr. Vikas Verma, Adv.

Mr. Naveen Gupta, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Order

6. Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order and O.T. is granted.

7. Leave granted.

8. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.

———