Category - Latest Judgments

The facts revealed during the hearing of these writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution suggest a mining scandal of enormous proportions and one involving megabucks.

Legal Aid and ADR — Mediation — Dispute settlement — Held, parties settled their disputes amicably — In the instant case, in terms of the settlement, appellant has handed over a Demand Draft for a sum of Rs 61,00,000/- to R...

Criminal Law — Public Accountability, Vigilance and Prevention of Corruption — Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — S. 13 — Criminal misconduct under — Scope

Criminal Law — Public Accountability, Vigilance and Prevention of Corruption — Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — S. 13 — Criminal misconduct under — Scope

Heard Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, learned senior counsel along with Mr. C.V. Chandrashekar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Basava Prabhu Patil, learned senior counsel for the State of Karnataka. We have also heard Mr. P.S...

We have heard the learned counsels for the parties.

We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants - plaintiffs.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the relevant material.

Leave granted.

The accused appellant has been convicted under Section 13(1)(c) and (d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as “the P.C. Act”) by the learned trial Court.