An arbitral proceeding took place between the appellant and the respondent under the Arbitration Act 1940.
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Classic Binding Industries
A neat question of law which arises in these appeals revolve around Section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).
SEI Adhavan Power Private Limited v.
Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner(s).
Kumuda v. State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police
Leave granted.
U.P. Jal Nigam & Ors. v. Ajit Singh Patel & Ors.
The only liberty granted to the petitioners and as rightly understood by the learned Advocate General appearing for the State was to segregate the tainted from the untainted as per Order dated 16.03.2018.
K.K. Suresh & Anr. etc. v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. etc.
These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 28.06.2007 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Appeal No. 479 of 2002 and Writ Appeal No. 480 of 2002 whereby the High Court, by a common...
Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy v. Union of India & Ors.
In the course of hearing of the petition, we sought the assistance of Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India. According to Mr. Venugopal, apart from positive law and repeal of statutes which relate to the stigma...
Food Corporation of India & Anr. v. Head Load Labour Congress (Regn. No. 336/85) & Anr.
These two appeals namely Civil Appeal No. 10530 of 2011 and Civil Appeal No. 7961 of 2014 are directed against the final judgment and order dated 15.02.2010 passed by High Court of Kerela in Writ Appeal No. 249 of 2009 which...
Arun Kumar Yadav and Others v. Dr. Prabhat Kumar etc.
Issue notice only qua petitioner Nos. 10, 26, 27, 60, 68, 81, 97, 98, 99 and 100, returnable within four weeks.
Kanika Goel v. State of Delhi Thr. SHO & Anr.
Heard Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, learned counsel for the appellant and Dr. A.M. Singhvi, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, learned counsel for respondent No. 2.

