A. Land Acquisition and Requisition — Compulsory acquisition of appellant’s land — Lapse of — Appellant had an accrued right which must be recognized by S. 24(2) of the Act — The Ordinance which purported to take away such an...
Category - Latest Judgments
Latest Judgments of Supreme Court
R. Radhakrishnan & Ors. v. The Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu & Ors.
Land Acquisition and Requisition — Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2014 — S. 24(2) — Proviso — Period of stay obtained in the judicial...
Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/s. Godrej Hershey Ltd.
The Revenue is before us in appeal. This Court, by an order dated 22nd March, 2006, remanded this very matter in the following terms: “The issue relates to the classification of the beverages manufactured by the appellant...
Dr. I. Ismail v. K. Shameem Rani & Anr.
Service law — Misconduct — Removal from service and subsequent reinstatement — Appeal challenging the order of the High Court holding that most of the charges including sexual harassment leveled against the appellant are proved...
Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai v. M/s. Gillette Diversified Operations Ltd. & Ors.
Excise — Excise duty — Respondent i.e. M/s Gillette entered into an agreement with another company known as M/s Rialto — As per the said agreement, an arrangement was agreed to between Gillette and Rialto whereby Rialto was to...
Savelife Foundation & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
Constitution of India — Arts. 32, 142, 21, 14 and 144 — Public interest litigation — Road accidents — Protection of bystander or good Samaritan — Petitioner prayed for development of supportive legal framework to protect...
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Through its Commissioner v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad (hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation” against the judgment and order dated 26.03.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay...
M/s. Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise
Excise — Excise duty — Assessable value — If an arrangement exists between the seller and the buyer of excisable goods for return of the packing materials by the buyer to the seller, carrying an obligation on the seller to return...
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise v. M/s. Vijay Mining Equipments
The issue involved in the present appeals is whether drilling rigs mounted on motor vehicles chassis are classifiable under Chapter Sub-Heading 8703.00 as claimed by the Revenue or it is classified under Chapter Sub-Heading 8430...
Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. U.O.I. & Anr.
It is submitted at the Bar that most of the States have filed the compliance report. Learned counsel for the State of Karnataka submits that he will file its compliance report within three days hence.

