1. Appellant has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 09.08.2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (briefly ‘the High Court’ hereinafter) in Writ Petition No. 3269 of 2004 (Saudi...

1. The sole accused, A1, convicted among the five arrayed by the prosecution, is before us challenging his conviction and the sentence imposed. A2 and A4 died before the charges were framed and A3 was bedridden, in which...

1. Leave Granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.

1. Interference caused by the High Court of Delhi1 in the writ petition preferred by the first respondent under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India resulting in setting aside the order passed by the learned...

1. Leave granted.

1. The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur1, by the impugned judgment and order dated 22nd January, 20262, has spurned the appellant's challenge in a writ petition3 to an order of externment and, while dismissing such...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 28.07.2009 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court allowing the Writ Petition No. 1278 of 2003 filed by the respondent-Port of Bombay Trust, the Union of India and Others have...

1. Two of the above set of civil appeals relate to the very same property i.e. 65.94 acres in various survey numbers, of which the actual dispute is with respect to 40.65 acres; whether those are assigned lands, which revert back...