1. Contempt of court is a serious legal infraction that strikes at the very soul of justice and the sanctity of legal proceedings.

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:

1. Cox & Kings Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “petitioner”) has filed the present petition in terms of Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “the Act...

1. The petition, invoking Article 32 of the Constitution, has been instituted by former civil servants, scholars, activists and experts in fields such as International Relations, Human Rights and Policy Analysis.

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.05.2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in CWP No. 20380 of 2012.

1. Both these Appeals are arising out of the Common Impugned Order dated 11.03.2022 passed by the High Court of Delhi in W.P (Crl.) No. 1808 of 2021 and Crl. M.C. No. 2442 of 2021, filed by the Appellants (Original Petitioners)...

1. Orders alike, dismissing their claims, having been passed by the original and appellate forums, Chalasani Udaya Shankar, Sripathi Sreevana Reddy and Yalamanchilli Manjusha are in appeal under Section 423 of the Companies Act...

1. These appeals are against the common judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dated 21.11.2019 dismissing the writ appeals filed by the appellant herein and upholding the order of the single judge of the High Court...

1. Civil Appeals 2809-2810 of 2024, by the appellant filed under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 19861, read with Order XXIV of the Supreme Court Rules, assail the correctness of the final judgment and order dated 15...

1. Heard Mr. Arvind P. Datar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the writ petitioners.