1. Leave granted.

1. These appeals arise from the judgment dated 17th August, 2012 rendered by the Division Bench of High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby, the intra-court appeals1 preferred by the appellants herein were dismissed and the...

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 22nd April, 2009 passed in S.A. No. 10 of 2005.

1. Heard Mr. K. Parameshwar, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant.

1. This Appeal has been preferred by the son of Shri Jai Prakash, a deceased constable in Haryana Police, seeking appointment on compassionate grounds, as his father and another constable died while on duty on 22.11.1997.

1. Heard Mr. Kailash Vasudev, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant(s). Also heard Mr. Jaideep Gupta, learned Amicus Curiae assisted by Mr. Kunal Chatterjee, learned counsel for the respondent.

This is how the importance of shelter has been described by a famous Hindi poet ‘Pradeep’.

1. The six appellants are the plaintiffs in a suit for specific performance of a contract.

1. The petitioner has instituted proceedings under Article 137 of the Constitution read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 seeking a review of the judgment of a three-Judge Bench of this Court dated 25 August...

1. In the present batch of appeals, this Court has to decide the contours defining the independence and impartiality of arbitral tribunals under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.1