Latest Judgments

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Anr. v. Union of India

On an oral request made by the learned Attorney General, order dated 11.03.2015 passed in T.P.(C) 391 of 2015 is hereby modified so as to be read as under (with underlined modifications):β€”

(Anil R. Dave, J. Chelameswar and Madan B. Lokur, JJ.)

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Anr. ________________________________________________ Petitioner(s)

v.

Union of India _____________________________________ Respondent

Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 13/2015, decided on March 24, 2015

With

W.P.(C) No. 23/2015, W.P.(C) No. 70/2015, W.P.(C) No. 83/2015, T.P.(C) No. 391/2015, W.P.(C) No. 108/2015 and W.P.(C) No. 124/2015

The Order of the court was delivered by


Order

T.P.(C) No. 391 of 2015

1. On an oral request made by the learned Attorney General, order dated 11.03.2015 passed in T.P.(C) 391 of 2015 is hereby modified so as to be read as under (with underlined modifications):β€”

β€œIssue notice, returnable on 17.03.2015.

In view of the fact that the matter involving the same issue is pending before the High Court of Madras and other High Courts, we direct that there shall be stay of further proceedings in Writ Petition (MD) No. 69 of 2015 titled as β€œY. Krishnan v. Union of India” pending before the High Court of Judicature at Madras, Bench at Madurai and all other matters on the said subject shall not be taken up for hearing by any High Court till further orders.

List all the matters on 17.03.2015 at 10.30 A.M. (for whole day).”

W.P.(C) No. 124 of 2015

2. The application filed by Mr. Mathews J. Nedumpara to argue in person before the Court is rejected. The name of Mr. Robin Mazumdar, AOR, who was earlier appearing for him, be shown in the Cause List.

W.P. (C) No. 13 of 2015, W.P.(C) No. 23 of 2015, W.P.(C) No. 70 of 2015, W.P.(C) No. 83 of 2015, T.P.(C) No. 391 of 2015, W.P. (C) No. 108 of 2015, W.P.(C) No. 124 of 2015.

3. Mr. F.S. Nariman, learned senior counsel, started his arguments at 11.10 AM and concluded at 11.25 AM. Thereafter, Mr. Anil B. Divan, learned senior counsel, started his arguments and concluded at 11.45 AM. Thereafter, Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, learned Attorney General, started his arguments and concluded.

4. Arguments concluded.

5. Judgment reserved.

β€”β€”β€”