Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Another v, Union of India

April 23, 2015

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 13/2015

Constitution of India — Arts. 32 and 124-A — Writ petition — National Judicial Appointments Commission — Constitution of India — Attorney General stated that same will be completed by nomination of two eminent persons, at the earliest — Further, Commission shall presently deal with appointments of existing Additional Judges only — Held, for further interim directions, the matter will be taken up on 11-5-2015 — National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014, Ss. 2, 5 and 6 (Para 1)

Print 🖨 PDF 📄

(Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. Chelameswar, Madan B. Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh Kumar Goel, JJ.)

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Another ____ Petitioner(s)

Union of India _________________________________________ Respondent

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 13/2015, decided on April 23, 2015

With

W.P. (C) No. 23/2015, W.P. (C) No. 70/2015, W.P. (C) No. 83/2015, T.P. (C) No. 391/2015, W.P. (C) No. 108/2015, W.P. (C) No. 124/2015, W.P. (C) No. 14/2015, W.P. (C) No. 18/2015, W.P. (C) No. 24/2015, W.P. (C) No. 209/2015

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General, having obtained instructions, states that the constitution of the National Judicial Appointments Commission will be completed by nomination of two eminent persons, at the earliest. He further states, that consequent upon the nomination of two eminent persons, the National Judicial Appointments Commission shall presently deal with appointments of existing Additional Judges only. For further interim directions, the matter will be taken up on 11.05.2015.

List again on 27.04.2015 at 10.30 A.M.

———

You may also like