Latest Judgments

State of Uttarakhand v. Union of India and Another

Mr. H.P. Raval, learned senior counsel appearing for defendant No. 2-State of U.P. submits that I.A. No. 3, having regard to the facts as stated in the affidavit for setting aside the ex-parte order, may be allowed even on imposition of reasonable costs.

(Kurian Joseph and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ.)

State of Uttarakhand _______________________________ Petitioner;

v.

Union of India and Another ______________________ Respondent(s).

(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T. and application on behalf of defendant No. 2 to set aside/recall the order dated 16.12.2013 passed by this Hon’ble Court directing to proceed ex-parte against defendant No. 2 and office report) (For final disposal)

Original Suit No(s). 5/2012, decided on February 6, 2017

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

1. Mr. H.P. Raval, learned senior counsel appearing for defendant No. 2-State of U.P. submits that I.A. No. 3, having regard to the facts as stated in the affidavit for setting aside the ex-parte order, may be allowed even on imposition of reasonable costs.

2. Mr. A. Sharan, learned senior counsel appearing for the plaintiff-State of Uttarakhand submits that the State of Uttarakhand may be given liberty to file memo of costs incurred by the State of U.P. till the applicant-State has been set ex-parte.

———