(Kurian Joseph and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.)
State Bank of India and Ors. ________________________ Petitioner(s)
v.
Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. and Ors. __________________ Respondent(s)
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6828-6831/2016, decided on March 9, 2016
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
1. Issue notice returnable on 30th March, 2016.
2. In view of the submission made by Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General for India, that Respondent No. 3 is reportedly out of country, the petitioners are permitted to serve notice to Respondent No. 3 through Respondent No. 2 Company.
3. The petitioners are also permitted to serve notice to Respondent No. 3 through the learned counsel appearing for him before the High Court and the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
4. The petitioners are also permitted to serve notice to Respondent No. 3 through the Indian High Commission at London, U.K. or any other Embassy.
5. The petitioners are also permitted to serve notice to Respondent No. 3 through his official E-Mail I.D. as a Member of the Rajya Sabha.
6. Post on 30th March, 2016.
———
