Shankar Hiranna Rajanna v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Ors.

July 12, 2016

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11675/2016

Without prejudice to the contentions available to both sides, we are of the view that an attempt should be made to see whether M/s. Raj Doshi Exports Pvt. Ltd.- petitioner No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 11678/2016 commands the required 70% consent of the tenants/occupants.

Print 🖨 PDF 📄

(Kurian Joseph and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.)

Shankar Hiranna Rajanna _____________________________ Petitioner

Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Ors. ______________________________________________ Respondent(s)

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11675/2016, decided on July 12, 2016

With

SLP(C) No. 11678/2016

The Order of the court was delivered by

Order

1. Without prejudice to the contentions available to both sides, we are of the view that an attempt should be made to see whether M/s. Raj Doshi Exports Pvt. Ltd.- petitioner No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 11678/2016 commands the required 70% consent of the tenants/occupants.

2. We direct the Chief Officer, Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board (MBRRB) to call for a meeting of the tenants/occupants and ascertain whether the said petitioner has 70% consent. This shall be done within a period of four weeks from today.

3. List after six weeks.

———

You may also like