(Uday Umesh Lalit and Vineet Saran, JJ.)
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 23223/2018+, decided on September 17, 2019
Saurav Yadav and Others __________________________ Petitioner(s);
v.
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others ___________________ Respondent(s).
(I.A. No. 135216/2019 – For Direction) – Listed
(I.A. No. 141782/2019 – For Intervention; and, IA No. 141783/2019 – For Appropriate Orders/Directions; IA No. 117317/2018 – For Exemption From Filing O.T.; IA No. 107076/2019 – For Exemption From Filing O.T.; IA No. 134605/2018 – For Exemption From Filing O.T.; IA No. 171202/2018 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 153838/2018 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 148889/2018 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 97505/2019 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 143780/2018 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 49153/2019 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 37943/2019 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 35557/2019 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 127686/2018 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 34139/2019 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 121759/2018 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 182899/2018 – For Intervention/Impleadment; IA No. 134604/2018 – For Permission to File Additional Documents/Facts/Annexures)
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 23223/2018; WA No. 11729/2018; I.A. No. 135216/2019; I.A. No. 141782/2019; IA No. 141783/2019; IA No. 117317/2018; IA No. 107076/2019; IA No. 134605/2018; IA No. 171202/2018; IA No. 153838/2018; IA No. 148889/2018; IA No. 97505/2019; IA No. 143780/2018; IA No. 49153/2019; IA No. 37943/2019; IA No. 35557/2019; IA No. 127686/2018; IA No. 34139/2019; IA No. 121759/2018; IA No. 182899/2018; and IA No. 134604/2018
The Order of the court was delivered by
Order
I.A. NO. 135216/19
1. Notice was issued on this application on 12-9-20191.
2. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned AAG for the State makes a statement that keeping in view the direction issued by this Court on 24.07.20192, no candidate shall be excluded from the selection process merely because he/she had used blade/whitener and in case merit position of the candidate demands and entitles him/her to be selected, no prejudice shall be caused to him/her merely for using blade/whitener. Statement is taken on record.
3. In view of the above statement, nothing further need be done in the interlocutory application.
4. The interlocutory application stands disposed of accordingly.
I.A. No. 141782/2019 & IA No. 141783/2019
5. At the request of Ms. V. Mohana, learned senior counsel, these IAs are taken on record.
6. All the issues have already been dealt with in the orders passed by this Court from time to time. Nothing further needs to be dealt with or reserved for consideration by any other Court.
7. The interlocutory applications are, accordingly, disposed of.
———
+ Arising from final Judgment and Order in Yadav Dharmendra Pratap v. State of U.P., 2018 SCC OnLine All ## (Allahabad High Court, Writ-A No. 11729 of 2018, dt. 16-5-2018)
1 Saurav Yadav v. State of U.P., SLP (C) No. 23223 of 2018, order dated 12-9-2019 (SC)
2 Ashish Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P., IA No. 103934 of 2018 in SLP (C) No. 20015 of 2018, order dated 24-7-2019 (SC)
