(Anil R. Dave and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ.)
Sarup Singh (D) Lrs. & Ors. _________________________ Appellant(s)
v.
Union of India & Anr. ____________________________ Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal No. 6491 of 2016 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 13100 of 2015], decided on July 15, 2016
The Judgement of the Court was delivered by
Anil R. Dave, J.:—
1. Heard the learned counsel.
2. Leave granted.
3. It is not in dispute that the land in question is like the land, which was covered under the judgment delivered on 13th February, 2014, by this Court in Civil Appeal No. 2091 of 2014 in the case of Impulse India P. Ltd. v. Union of India, and they are in the same village.
4. In the circumstances, the appeal is disposed of in terms of paragraph 14 of the afore-stated judgment in Civil Appeal No. 2091 of 2014, which is extracted below:
“14. In the result, we allow the appeals filed by the claimants. We enhance the compensation awarded by the High Court for Block ‘A’ lands from Rs. 16.50 lacs to Rs. 21/- lacs per acre and from Rs. 14.60 lacs to Rs. 19/- lacs per acre for Block ‘B’ lands respectively. This compensation so awarded by us is common to all the lands in Bharthal, Bijwasan, Pochanpur and Dhul Saras villages. Needless to say that the appellants are entitled for all the statutory benefits provided under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.”
5. The amount of compensation stands enhanced. Accordingly, the civil appeal stands disposed of as allowed. Pending application, if any, shall stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
6. Needless to say that if there is any delay in filing or refiling the appeal, the interest with regard to the said period shall not be given to the appellants.
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).13100/2015
Sarup Singh (D) Lrs. & Ors __________________________ Petitioner(s)
v.
Union of India & Anr _____________________________ Respondent(s)
Date: 15/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.
(Before Anil R. Dave and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ.)
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bankey Bihari, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv.
UOI Mr. M.P. Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv.
For Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv.
Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Bhatia, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Order
7. Leave granted.
8. The appeal is disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs in terms of the signed Non-reportable judgment.
———
