Having seen the original record, which was sent to us by the Registrar General of the High Court of Gauhati, we are satisfied that the interim order passed by the High Court dated 07.01.2016 calls for no interference at this...
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ramesh Chand
In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case we are of the view that the respondent should not have been granted backwages.
M/s. Rahman Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. State of U.P. and Others
The appellant challenged the award dated 27.08.2010 passed under the provisions of the Timely Payment of Wages Act, 1978 and the recovery before the High Court leading to the impugned judgment dated 09.02.2011. The High Court...
Sankalp Charitable Trust and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
Issue or pass any writ, direction or order, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
Snehasish Mukherjee v. Union of India & Anr.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already made several representations on the subject matter of the petition and the last one was made on 5th August, 2015 to the Secretary...
M/s. Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd. v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board & Anr.
Infrastructure Laws — Energy and Power — Concessional tariff of electricity — Benefit of — Question whether the State would be estopped from altering/modifying the benefit of concessional tariff by means of the impugned G.O No...
M/s. Madras Petrochem Ltd. & Anr. v. BIFR & Ors.
Corporate Laws — Winding up of company — Expression "reference" in S. 15(1) of SICA vis-à-vis "proceedings in S. 22 — Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 prevails...
Nabam Rebia v. Registrar General, Gauhati High Court and Ors.
In Writ Petition(C) No. 53 of 2016, on 27.01.2016, notice was issued to respondent No. 2 and liberty was granted inter alia to respondent No. 2 to file his counter affidavit, if any, by 29.01.2016. Additionally, Mr. Satya Pal...
Mahendra Bhimrao Kharat and Ors. v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Ors.
The appellants have mainly three apprehensions viz. i) with regard to the area that will be allotted to them after the construction; ii) with regard to the Agreement to be executed regarding the allotment before they vacate; and...
Rajendra Kumar Tekriwal v. M/s. Unique Constrn. P. Ltd. & Ors.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondents and interveners. Respondent No. 1 has also filed cross appeal. During the course of hearing, we are informed that the Arbitrator is in seisin of the...







