Criminal Trial — Quashing of proceedings — Return of dowry — Giving of dowry and the traditional presents at or about the time of wedding does not in any way raise a presumption that such a property was thereby entrusted and put...

Land Acquisition and Requisition — Acquisition of land — Notification and award — Quashing of — Public interest and public purpose over private interest of the respondent, a private colonizer — Applicability of equity doctrines...

Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Union of India, and Mr. Vikas Singh Jangra, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Governor of Arunachal Pradesh.  

In view of judgment passed today in Civil Appeal No. 434 of 2016 (@ SLP (Civil) No. 23311 of 2015) titled “State of Rajasthan v. Gotan Lime Stone Khanji Udyog Private Limited”, no further order is necessary in this petition. The...

By our order dated 17.12.2014, while recording the submissions made by Shri Mukul Rohatgi, learned Attorney General for India, we had stated that they can proceed with the selection process, but before any appointments are made...

A. Rent Control and Eviction — Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — S. 55(2) — Tenancy — Determination of — Non- registration — Effect of — S. 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 does provide for registration of leases...

Excise — Excise duty — Show cause notice — Assessee had short paid the duty on its products, that is, printed glass bottles, by under-valuing the same at the time of clearance from its factory inasmuch as it did not add...

The issue pertains to the determination of just compensation for the land acquired from the appellants. The dispute is in a narrow compass as to whether there should be 75% deduction for development charges.

 Leave granted.

The facts in nutshell are that the respondents herein filed a Suit against the appellant before the English Court for infringement of patent vested in the respondents besides other reliefs.