Service Law — Pay — Pay scale, fixation and revision — Rajasthan Civil Services (Revised Pay Scale for Government College Teachers including Librarians, PTIs) Rules, 1999 — Consequential benefit of revised pay scales of...
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
North Bengal University & Ors. v. Dilip Kumar Sarkar
Constitution of India — Arts. 226 and 132 — Judicial order — True factual position of case — If overlooked — Service matter — Disciplinary proceedings initiated against respondent/Controller of Examinations, University of North...
Joy v. Mani
Practice and Procedure — Compromise — Where parties to the litigation settled their dispute amicably before a mediator — Held, decree of trial court quashed — Direction to the parties to place the terms of agreement before the...
Gaurav Kumar @ Monu v. State of Haryana
Criminal Law — Criminal Trial — Juvenile/Child Accused — Commission of heinous crimes — Defence of juvenility — Awareness of consequences of committing heinous crimes — Increment in the rate of crime and the nature of crime...
Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan
A. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — S. 18 — Meaning of the term “possession” — Establishing possession — Animus and mental intent — Requisite degree of control B. Interpretation of Statutes — Particular...
Ramesh Verma (D) Tr. Lrs. v. Lajesh Saxena (D) by Lrs & Anr.
These appeals arise out of the common judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in First Appeal Nos. 29, 30 & 31 of 1991 dated 31.07.1997.
M. Mahendar Kumar v. M. Mani & Ors.
Criminal Law — S. 482 — Inherent Powers of High Court — Interference with investigation/FIR — Suppression/Non-disclosure of material facts — Effect of — Respondent after dismissal of his SLP filed a case before the High Court...
Teesta Atul Setalvad and Anr. v. State of Gujarat
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — S. 438 — Anticipatory bail — Benefit of — Question whether liberty on the one hand and fair and effective investigation on the other, make out a case for extending the benefit — Trust for 2002 riot...
Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise, Aurangabad v. M/s. Roofit Industries Ltd.
Excise — Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 — S. 11-A(1) — Central Excise Rules, 1994 — R. 9(1) — Differential central excise duty — Recovery of — Goods were to be delivered at the place of the buyer and it is only at that place...
Basavantappa v. Irappa (D) by Lrs. & Ors.
The only issue is with regard to payment of the amount which had been paid by the appellant to the respondents at the time of entering into an agreement to purchase the property in question.







