1. As common question of law and facts arise in these two appeals both these appeals are decided and disposed of together.

1. Challenging an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, passed under Section 35(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, allowing 91 purchasers of 51 apartments in the residential complex developed by...

1. The Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court allowed an appeal against the judgment of the Single Judge of the High Court in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the disciplinary proceedings initiated...

1. The appellant is before this Court in this appeal assailing the judgment dated 23.02.2017 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No. 691/2013 titled Ram Ratan v. State of Madhya Pradesh.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

2. The case of the prosecution as culled out from the impugned judgment is that the informant, Bodhi Mahto (PW-3) had got his daughter, Fulwa Devi, married to Ram Sahay Mahto (A-1) in the year 1997 and within a few months of the...

1. No alternative arrangements have been made and looking into the over all circumstances of the case, no case of contempt is made out.

1. The petitioner has sought to challenge the validity of Section 194A(3)(ixa) of the Income Tax Act 1961 under which tax is deducted at source on the interest payable under an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal1.

1. The present appeal is directed against an order passed in an intra-court appeal by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi on 28.5.2012 whereby the judgment and decree passed by the learned Single Bench of...