1. As common questions of law and facts arise in this group of appeals from the same land acquisition proceedings, all these appeals are decided and disposed of by this common judgment.

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree in Regular Second Appeal No. 372 of 2003 dated 03.10.2008, whereby the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore has dismissed the appeal.  

2. That the Corporate Debtor was a private sector Ship Building Yard with its manufacturing activities at Dahej Yard and Surat Yard in Gujarat and having its corporate office at Mumbai.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 29.03.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur in D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 33 of 2014 by which the High Court has allowed...

1. Delay condoned.

1. The present appeal was initially filed by the appellant-Bibi Sidhika, the mother of the accused Mohd. Firoz, challenging the legality and validity of the impugned common judgement and order dated 15.07.2014 passed by the High...

2. Considering the fact that both the show cause notices - one dated 01.03.2016 issued by the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, Delhi Zonal Unit and the subsequent show cause notice dated 23.10.2017 issued by...

1. Leave granted.

1. These appeals by special leave filed by original accused Nos. 1 to 4 are directed against the common judgment and order dated 04th September 2017 passed by the High Court1 in Criminal Reference Case No. 14 of 2010; and in...

1. This is yet another case where contrary to the vision of the founding fathers, non-adherence to the principles governing the exercise of power by the first appellate Court has driven the parties to the highest Court. The...