1. This appeal arises out of the dismissal of a writ petition challenging the outcome of the proceedings under Section 9-A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.

1. We have gone through the impugned order(s) passed by the High Court.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 02.07.2021 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Writ Appeal No. 272/2020, by which the Division Bench of the High Court has...

1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order dated 22.02.2019 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad whereby the warrant of authorization dated 07.08.2018 issued by the appellant1 under Section 132 of the...

1. The present appeals arise out of the three writ petitions which were decided by a common order dated 23.07.2021.

1. As common question of law and facts arise in this group of appeals and as such arise out of the impugned common judgment and order passed by the High Court, all these appeals are decided and disposed of together by this common...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. Mr. S V Raju, Additional Solicitor General, appearing with Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, submits that the State of Uttar Pradesh seeks to file a counter affidavit.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 19.12.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ Petition Nos. 8339/2012 and 8340/2012, by which the High Court has allowed...