1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 29.10.2009 whereby the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed, confirming the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Bathinda...

1. We have heard learned senior counsels appearing on both sides and perusing the material available on record.

1. The appellants are before this Court claiming to be aggrieved by the judgment dated 18.12.2018 passed by the Division Bench, High Court of Judicature at Patna in LPA No. 342/2018.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. Learned counsel for the parties state that the issue involved in the present appeal is covered by the decision of this Court in ‘Dabur India Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut’ (2004) 13 SCC 107.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 01.03.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 1648 of 2015 whereby the High Court has declared that the...

1. Delay is condoned and leave is granted.

1. These appeals give rise to an important question concerning appellate jurisdiction of the High Courts under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 19611 against judgments of Income Tax Appellate Tribunals2. As Benches of the ITAT...

1. Considering the fact that earlier the Assessing Officer had called upon the petitioner(s) to produce the evidence in support of increase of authorised share-capital, produce the evidence of share allotment and names and...