1. Leave granted.

1. The present Appeal has been filed challenging the ex-parte judgment and order dated 16th April 2009 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa acquitting the Respondent No. 1-Accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable...

1. We have heard learned counsel, Mr. Rituraj Biswas and Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Sr. AAG. Respondent No. 5, despite the service of notice of the pending proceedings, is not represented.

1. The present appeals assail the reversing judgment of the Karnataka High Court1 setting aside the common order passed by the Additional District Judge Bellary2 under Provincial Insolvency Act, 19203. For the reasons to follow...

1. The present Appeal has been filed challenging the ex-parte judgment and order dated 16th April 2009 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa acquitting the Respondent No. 1-Accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable...

1. This appeal emanates from an order dated 11.08.2014 passed in Writ Petition (C) No. 5005 of 2014 by which High Court of Delhi has dismissed the writ petition preferred by the appellant.

Heard learned senior counsel and/or counsel for the parties.

1. This appeal emanates from an order dated 11.08.2014 passed in Writ Petition (C) No. 5005 of 2014 by which High Court of Delhi has dismissed the writ petition preferred by the appellant.

1. The present appeals assail the reversing judgment of the Karnataka High Court1 setting aside the common order passed by the Additional District Judge Bellary2 under Provincial Insolvency Act, 19203. For the reasons to follow...

1. We have heard learned counsel, Mr. Rituraj Biswas and Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Sr. AAG. Respondent No. 5, despite the service of notice of the pending proceedings, is not represented.